Quantum computing is the area of study focused on developing computer technology based on the principles of quantum theory, which explains the nature and behavior of energy and matter on the quantum (atomic and subatomic) level. Development of a quantum computer, if practical, would mark a leap forward in computing capability far greater than that from the abacus to a modern day supercomputer, with performance gains in the billion-fold realm and beyond. The quantum computer, following the laws of quantum physics, would gain enormous processing power through the ability to be in multiple states, and to perform tasks using all possible permutations simultaneously. Current centers of research in quantum computing include MIT, IBM, Oxford University, and the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

The essential elements of quantum computing originated with Paul Benioff, working at Argonne National Labs, in 1981. He theorized a classical computer operating with some quantum mechanical principles. But it is generally accepted that David Deutsch of Oxford University provided the critical impetus for quantum computing research. In 1984, he was at a computation theory conference and began to wonder about the possibility of designing a computer that was based exclusively on quantum rules, then published his breakthrough paper a few months later. With this, the race began to exploit his ideas. However, before we delve into what he started, it is beneficial to have a look at the background of the quantum world.

#### Quantum Theory

Quantum theory's development began in 1900 with a presentation by Max Planck to the German
Physical Society, in which he introduced the idea that energy exists in individual units (which he
called "quanta"), as does matter. Further developments by a number of scientists over the following
thirty years led to the modern understanding of quantum theory.

#### The Essential Elements of Quantum Theory:

- Energy, like matter, consists of discrete units, rather than solely as a continuous wave.
- Elementary particles of both energy and matter, depending on the conditions, may behave like either particles or waves.
- The movement of elementary particles is inherently random, and, thus, unpredictable.
- The simultaneous measurement of two complementary values, such as the position and momentum of an elementary particle, is inescapably flawed; the more precisely one value is measured, the more flawed will be the measurement of the other value.

#### Further Developments of Quantum Theory

Niels Bohr proposed the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory, which asserts that a particle is whatever it is measured to be (for example, a wave or a particle) but that it cannot be assumed to have specific properties, or even to exist, until it is measured. In short, Bohr was saying that objective reality does not exist. This translates to a principle called superposition that claims that while we do not know what the state of any object is, it is actually in all possible states simultaneously, as long as we don't look to check.

To illustrate this theory, we can use the famous and somewhat cruel analogy of Schrodinger's Cat. First, we have a living cat and place it in a thick lead box. At this stage, there is no question that the cat is alive. We then throw in a vial of cyanide and seal the box. We do not know if the cat is alive or if it has broken the cyanide capsule and died. Since we do not know, the cat is both dead and alive, according to quantum law - in a superposition of states. It is only when we break open the box and see what condition the cat is in that the superposition is lost, and the cat must be either alive or dead.

The second interpretation of quantum theory is the *multiverse* or *many-worlds*
theory. It holds that as soon as a potential exists for any object to be in any state, the universe
of that object transmutes into a series of parallel universes equal to the number of possible
states in which that the object can exist, with each universe containing a unique single possible
state of that object. Furthermore, there is a mechanism for interaction between these universes
that somehow permits all states to be accessible in some way and for all possible states to be
affected in some manner. Stephen Hawking and the late Richard Feynman are among the scientists who
have expressed a preference for the many-worlds theory.

Which ever argument one chooses, the principle that, in some way, one particle can exist in numerous states opens up profound implications for computing.

#### A Comparison of Classical and Quantum Computing

Classical computing relies, at its ultimate level, on principles expressed by Boolean algebra,
operating with a (usually) 7-mode logic gate principle,
though it is possible to exist with only three modes (which are AND, NOT, and COPY). Data must be
processed in an exclusive binary state at any point in time - that is, either 0 (off / false) or 1
(on / true). These values are binary digits, or bits. The millions of transistors and capacitors at
the heart of computers can only be in one state at any point. While the time that the each
transistor or capacitor need be either in 0 or 1 before switching states is now measurable in
billionths of a second, there is still a limit as to how quickly these devices can be made to
switch state. As we progress to smaller and faster circuits, we begin to reach the physical limits
of materials and the threshold for classical laws of physics to apply. Beyond this, the quantum
world takes over, which opens a potential as great as the challenges that are presented.

The Quantum computer, by contrast, can work with a two-mode logic gate: XOR and a mode we'll
call QO1 (the ability to change 0 into a superposition of 0 and 1, a logic gate which cannot exist
in classical computing). In a quantum computer, a number of elemental particles such as electrons
or photons can be used (in practice, success has also been achieved with ions), with either their
charge or polarization acting as a representation of 0 and/or 1. Each of these particles is known
as a quantum bit, or qubit, the nature and behavior of these particles form the basis of quantum
computing. The two most relevant aspects of quantum physics are the principles of superposition and
*entanglement* .

#### Superposition

Think of a qubit as an electron in a magnetic field. The electron's spin may be either in
alignment with the field, which is known as a *spin-up* state, or opposite to the field, which
is known as a *spin-down* state. Changing the electron's spin from one state to another is
achieved by using a pulse of energy, such as from a laser - let's say that we use
1 unit of laser energy. But what if we only use half a unit of laser energy and completely isolate
the particle from all external influences? According to quantum law, the particle then enters a
superposition of states, in which it behaves as if it were in both states simultaneously. Each
qubit utilized could take a superposition of both 0 and 1. Thus, the number of computations that a
quantum computer could undertake is 2^n, where n is the number of qubits used. A quantum computer
comprised of 500 qubits would have a potential to do 2^500 calculations in a single step. This is
an awesome number - 2^500 is infinitely more atoms than there are in the known universe (this is
true parallel processing - classical computers today, even so called parallel processors, still
only truly do one thing at a time: there are just two or more of them doing it). But how will these
particles interact with each other? They would do so via quantum entanglement.

**Entanglement** Particles (such as photons, electrons, or qubits) that have interacted at some
point retain a type of connection and can be entangled with each other in pairs, in a process known
as *correlation* . Knowing the spin state of one entangled particle - up or down - allows one
to know that the spin of its mate is in the opposite direction. Even more amazing is the knowledge
that, due to the phenomenon of superpostition, the measured particle has no single spin direction
before being measured, but is simultaneously in both a spin-up and spin-down state. The spin state
of the particle being measured is decided at the time of measurement and communicated to the
correlated particle, which simultaneously assumes the opposite spin direction to that of the
measured particle. This is a real phenomenon (Einstein called it "spooky action at a distance"),
the mechanism of which cannot, as yet, be explained by any theory - it simply must be taken as
given. Quantum entanglement allows qubits that are separated by incredible distances to interact
with each other instantaneously (not limited to the speed of light). No matter how great the
distance between the correlated particles, they will remain entangled as long as they are
isolated.

Taken together, quantum superposition and entanglement create an enormously enhanced computing
power. Where a 2-bit register in an ordinary computer can store only one of four binary
configurations (00, 01, 10, or 11) at any given time, a 2-qubit register in a quantum computer can
store all four numbers simultaneously, because each qubit represents two values. If more qubits are
added, the increased capacity is expanded exponentially.

#### Quantum Programming

Perhaps even more intriguing than the sheer power of quantum computing is the ability that it
offers to write programs in a completely new way. For example, a quantum computer could incorporate
a programming sequence that would be along the lines of "take all the superpositions of all the
prior computations" - something which is meaningless with a classical computer - which would permit
extremely fast ways of solving certain mathematical problems, such as factorization of large
numbers, one example of which we discuss below.

There have been two notable successes thus far with quantum programming. The first occurred in 1994
by Peter Shor, (now at AT&T Labs) who developed a quantum algorithm that could efficiently
factorize large numbers. It centers on a system that uses number theory to estimate the periodicity
of a large number sequence. The other major breakthrough happened with Lov Grover of Bell Labs in
1996, with a very fast algorithm that is proven to be the fastest possible for searching through
unstructured databases. The algorithm is so efficient that it requires only, on average, roughly N
square root (where N is the total number of elements) searches to find the desired result, as
opposed to a search in classical computing, which on average needs N/2 searches.

#### The Problems - And Some Solutions

The above sounds promising, but there are tremendous obstacles still to be overcome. Some of the problems with quantum computing are as follows:

- Interference - During the computation phase of a quantum calculation, the slightest disturbance in a quantum system (say a stray photon or wave of EM radiation) causes the quantum computation to collapse, a process known as de-coherence. A quantum computer must be totally isolated from all external interference during the computation phase. Some success has been achieved with the use of qubits in intense magnetic fields, with the use of ions.
- Error correction - Because truly isolating a quantum system has proven so difficult, error correction systems for quantum computations have been developed. Qubits are not digital bits of data, thus they cannot use conventional (and very effective) error correction, such as the triple redundant method. Given the nature of quantum computing, error correction is ultra critical - even a single error in a calculation can cause the validity of the entire computation to collapse. There has been considerable progress in this area, with an error correction algorithm developed that utilizes 9 qubits (1 computational and 8 correctional). More recently, there was a breakthrough by IBM that makes do with a total of 5 qubits (1 computational and 4 correctional).
- Output observance - Closely related to the above two, retrieving output data after a quantum calculation is complete risks corrupting the data. In an example of a quantum computer with 500 qubits, we have a 1 in 2^500 chance of observing the right output if we quantify the output. Thus, what is needed is a method to ensure that, as soon as all calculations are made and the act of observation takes place, the observed value will correspond to the correct answer. How can this be done? It has been achieved by Grover with his database search algorithm, that relies on the special "wave" shape of the probability curve inherent in quantum computers, that ensures, once all calculations are done, the act of measurement will see the quantum state decohere into the correct answer.

Even though there are many problems to overcome, the breakthroughs in the last 15 years, and especially in the last 3, have made some form of practical quantum computing not unfeasible, but there is much debate as to whether this is less than a decade away or a hundred years into the future. However, the potential that this technology offers is attracting tremendous interest from both the government and the private sector. Military applications include the ability to break encryptions keys via brute force searches, while civilian applications range from DNA modeling to complex material science analysis. It is this potential that is rapidly breaking down the barriers to this technology, but whether all barriers can be broken, and when, is very much an open question.

## Tech TalkComment

## Share

## Comments

## Results

## Contribute to the conversation